Overview
In this project, we focused on designing a more intuitive, accessible interface, moving through three core phases: Research, Design, and Development. This case study highlights the research and design journey, driven by user feedback and expert consultation.
Phase 1
Understand user pain points and gather actionable insights for designing an improved website experience.
Initial Review
As the first user, I performed a usability review to experience the website's flow and pinpoint potential issues firsthand.
Survey
I created and distributed a survey form to gather feedback from actual users
The survey focused on usability, accessibility, and overall user experience.
Objectives
Insights Mapping
I used a FigJam board to categorize survey results into four key areas: Positive Feedback, Negative Feedback, Recommendations, and Resources Mentioned.
Categorizing Meta Data
Expert Consultation
I consulted Dr. John Neuman, a well-known professor who teaches Accessible UX at UT Austin. He suggested conducting more user interviews to deepen the research.
User Interviews
Following the recommendation, I conducted additional user interviews, gathering more qualitative data.
I distilled these findings to refine the user personas and pain points.
Updated the Figjam Board following the interviews
User Research Insights
The Designs were usability-tested to ensure all elements aligned with user expectations.
Competitive Analysis
Based on the resources mentioned by users, I conducted a competitive analysis to benchmark Texas ERC website against similar platforms, focusing on usability, design trends, and accessibility.
I did SWOT analysis of the competitors and figured out all the areas of improvement.
Phase 2
Translate research insights into practical design solutions through iterative prototyping.
Major Design Update
Transforming User Experience with a 3-Column Redesign
In response to user pain points, we transitioned from a traditional 2-column layout to a more dynamic 3-column design.
This change aims to enhance navigation, streamline content flow, and improve overall usability. By addressing core challenges, we’re creating a more intuitive and efficient experience for users.
Projected Benefits
Improved Content Distribution: Easier navigation with clearly defined sections for key information.
Enhanced Accessibility: More flexible layout adapts better to diverse screen sizes and user needs.
Reduced Cognitive Load: Users can find information faster without overwhelming the interface.
Increased Engagement: More visible content encourages longer interaction with the site.
Initial Paper Wireframes
I sketched out the initial wireframes based on the insights gained from user research.
Low-Fidelity Designs
I then transitioned to low-fidelity (lo-fi) digital wireframes, focusing on the core layout and navigation structure without the distraction of detailed visuals.
My Design Decisions
Optimized User Flow: Reduced Number of Clicks for Seamless Navigation
The Two Navbars
The 3rd Column
Prioritizing Tabs
Phase 3
Currently I'm working on the development of the website. I'm using WordPress & Pantheon for the same. Additionally I'm using CSS3 to give styling to the elements of the website.